![]() ![]() The order of the High Court, declaring section 4(b) of the Drugs and Drug Trafficking Act 140 of 1992 to be inconsistent with the Constitution and invalid to the extent that it criminalises the use and/or possession of cannabis by a child, is confirmed. Section 4(b) of the Drugs Act infringes a child’s rights in sections 10 (dignity) and 28 (children) of the Constitution. There are less restrictive means available to protect a child from cannabis use and/or exposure. Church Ablaze Homecoming Conference Impartation Prayer Service with Pastor Zacc Live from the Gra - YouTube Welcome to Church Ablaze Homecoming Conference Impartation Prayer Service with Pastor. PHILLIP/AP Show More Show Less 27 of 33 28 of 33. The court finds that the criminalisation of the use and/or possession of cannabis by a child does not serve the intended purpose of protecting the child. The homes was among the forfeiture actions pending against defendants in Enron-related criminal cases. ![]() MHLANTLA J discusses the approach in the case of Prince (CC) the impact of criminalisation on the child children’s rights in section 28 of the Constitution a child’s right to dignity and the case of Teddy Bear Clinic (CC) the Children’s Act 38 of 2005 and the limitations on a child’s rights and whether the limitations are justified. ![]() Conference Room Classrooms Artist Studios The Show Room Calls for Art Become a. Glass Fusing Paint Your Own Pottery Clay Hand-Building Printmaking Birthday Parties Recording Studio Get Involved. At the ABA Annual Convention, we’ll tackle banking’s future, and address current hot topics at a high level. About the Print Shop Printmaking Classes LGB Printmaking Residency Field Trips. The section was declared inconsistent with the constitution. Cutting-edge banks stay a step ahead of the rest. The proceedings led to the High Court delving into the question of the constitutionality of section 4(b) of the Drugs and Drug Trafficking Act 140 of 1992 to the extent that it criminalises the use and/or possession of cannabis by a child. They did not comply with the diversion programmes and an order for admission to a compulsory residential diversion programme came before the High Court on review. They were brought before the magistrates’ court and agreements were concluded that included that the children participate in diversion programmes. Four children tested positive for cannabis during a school-sanctioned drug test. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |